Taking Up One’s Cross vs. a Building Taking Up One’s Name

The Amarillo Bishop who refused to think , "as human beings do."
Bishop Emeritus John W. Yanta, a descendant of those first settlers, established the Polish Heritage Center Foundation in 2011; yet he has not allowed the building to “take up his” name.

Why did the bishop who “set (his) face like flint,” and “was brought low” for trying to “break the vicious circle” the Amarillo Diocese’ was caught in with it’s “serious mistake” by refusing to tell “the victims of clergy sexual abuse” to, “Go in peace, keep warm, and eat well“; end up being the bishop who cannot “boast” about a building that will “take up his” name?

Twenty-fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time

“I say everybody wants to hear the truth
But still they all wanna tell a lie
Ohhh everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die”

I agree with our bishop, Patrick J. Zurek, in putting forth in his Holy Week homilies this year the Encyclical of Pope Francis, Fratelli Tutti, as the standard for love and unity in our diocese. Today, let’s reflect upon paragraph #251 in that regard:

CHAPTER SEVEN

PATHS OF RENEWED ENCOUNTER

MEMORY

Forgiving but not forgetting

251. Those who truly forgive do not forget. Instead, they choose not to yield to the same destructive force that caused them so much suffering. They break the vicious circle; they halt the advance of the forces of destruction. They choose not to spread in society the spirit of revenge that will sooner or later return to take its toll. Revenge never truly satisfies victims. Some crimes are so horrendous and cruel that the punishment of those who perpetrated them does not serve to repair the harm done. Even killing the criminal would not be enough, nor could any form of torture prove commensurate with the sufferings inflicted on the victim. Revenge resolves nothing.

TOP: Twenty years ago this building was named by John Salazar, a now defrocked priest, after a former “benevolent” bishop who gave him a “second chance”. Salazar used that chance to land himself in prison for sexual abuse at the parish of which this Religious Education Center is a mission.

BOTTOM: A building named after his “benevolent” bishop by a priest admirer.
Matthiesen, a Catholic bishop from 1980-1997, has campaigned against nuclear weapons and for acceptance of clergy sexual abusers. (Photo by Douglas Kirkland/Corbis via Getty Images)

Bishop Yanta removed all of them and left them with no means of livelihood. That is why I (Bishop Matthiesen) created the Priests Emergency Relief to help three of them:

From a 2008 letter in which Bishop Matthiesen defended the “serious mistake”

This approach demands of us the decision to abandon a modus operandi of disparaging, discrediting, playing the victim or the scold in our relationships, and instead to make room for the gentle breeze that the Gospel alone can offer.

From a January, 2019 letter by Pope francis to TO THE BISHOPS OF THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE
OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS
on retreat.
A retreat that Bishop Zurek missed in order to take a personal vacation.

Now that I have finished part of my experience with this “the few” I need to address you who are not part of them…Thank you for supporting Msgr. Colwell and Fr Roy. They and all my brother priests have given their lives for the service of the Gospel and the
mission of Christ as manifested through their ministry in the Church. They are not seeking wealth or fame and certainly not power or control.

From a 2019 letter in which Bishop Zurek uses the same “modus operandi” as Bishop Matthiessen

A Memorial in the Grotto of St. Mary’s Cathedral raised by Monsignor Waldow during Bishop Yanta’s episcopacy. Monsignor Waldow wrote:

“In memory of the death of innocence of the victims of clergy sexual abuse. When innocence dies…a life stops. It is essential that we never forget.”

A View From the Glenn

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Of the Glenn Enterprises

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading