Memorial of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Priest and Doctor of the Church

Saint Thomas Aquinas OP
Panel of a 15th-century altarpiece
Confessor
Doctor of the Church
Born
Tommaso d’Aquino
1225
Roccasecca, Kingdom of Sicily
Died
7 March 1274 (aged 48–49)
Fossanova, Papal States
Venerated in
Catholic Church
Anglican Communion[1]
Lutheranism[2]
Canonized
18 July 1323, Avignon, Papal States by Pope John XXII
Major shrine
Church of the Jacobins, Toulouse, France
Feast
28 January, 7 March (pre-1969 Roman calendar/traditional Dominican calendar)
Attributes
The Summa Theologiae, a model church, the sun on the chest of a Dominican friar
Patronage
Academics; against storms; against lightning; apologists; Aquino, Italy; Belcastro, Italy; booksellers; Catholic academies, schools, and universities; chastity; Falena, Italy; learning; pencil makers; philosophers; Saint Philip Neri Seminary; publishers; scholars; students; University of Santo TomasSto. Tomas, BatangasMangaldan, Pangasinan; theologians[3]

Other names
Doctor Angelicus (Angelic Doctor)
Doctor Communis (Universal Doctor)
Doctor Humanitatis (Doctor of Humanity/Humaneness)
Bos Mutus (Dumb Ox)

Education
Education
Abbey of Monte Cassino
University of Naples
University of Paris
Philosophical work
Era
Medieval philosophy
Region
Western philosophy
School
Scholasticism
Thomism
Aristotelianism
Theological intellectualism
Moderate realism[4]
Virtue ethics
Natural law
Correspondence theory of truth[5]
Main interests
Metaphysics
Logic
Theology
Mind
Epistemology
Ethics
Politics
Aristotelian theology
Notable works
Summa Theologiae
Summa contra Gentiles
Notable ideas
Natural law
Five ways
Analogia entis
Thomistic hylomorphism
Divine simplicity
Essence-existence Distinction
Peripatetic axiom
Principle of double effect
Homo unius libri
Infused righteousness
Theological intellectualism
Quiddity
Just price
Determinatio
Actus purus
Actus essendi
Thomistic sacramental theology

“Whoever has ears to hear ought to hear.”

Mark 4:1–20

“If Boston is the fault line of the child sexual-abuse scandal that has convulsed the Roman Catholic Church, then few places have felt the aftershocks more deeply than the Diocese of Amarillo.”

New York Times
August 24, 2002
Each day, I read a paragraph from the encyclical Dilexi te and weave a quotation from it into that day’s Lectio Divina.
Memorial in the Grotto of St. Mary’s Cathedral. The inscription says:
In memory of the death of innocence of the victims of clergy sexual abuse. When innocence dies…a life stops. It is essential that we never forget.

“’ The concern for the purity of the faith demands giving the answer of effective witness in the service of one’s neighbor, the poor and the oppressed in particular, in an integral theological fashion.’”

Dilexi te §98
“Bishop Matthiesen — a shepherd whose legacy in our diocese still asks hard questions of us today. May truth, healing, and justice be the final word.”
Photo used by permission of Douglas Kirkland/Corbis via Getty Images
Above: The Tribute to Bishop Matthiesen
Below: A Fallen Centennial Banner

And St. Thomas would say: patience is not weakness — it is strength governed by truth.

Perhaps the most paradoxical thing of all is this:
The seed grows in secret, and the farmer does not understand how. The Kingdom advances while the sower sleeps.

So tonight, I hear a quieter ought:

I ought to trust that truth grows even in hidden soil.
I ought to let the Word work longer than my impatience.
I ought to be rich soil before I demand a rich harvest.

A tribute, built for Bishop Matthiesen, while John Salazar —a convicted pedophile priest whom Matthiesen kept in ministry against the counsel of cardinal archbishops, giving Salazar a “second chance.” That second chance resulted in the sexual assault of youth in our own diocese. And just before he was defrocked and sent to prison, he raised this monument in Bishop Matthiesen’s honor. Its presence remains a painful reminder of “serious mistakes” that harmed the very flock Bishop Matthiesen was meant to protect.

Where my heart is hard, break it open.
Where it is shallow, deepen it.
Where it is crowded, clear it.

Amen.

Laudato si’ §52
Like the quiet soil in today’s Gospel, Matthew sings of an unnoticed life that still holds immeasurable worth. The world counts success; God counts faithfulness. This Lectio reminds me that what I think the Church ought to do must first be rooted in what I am willing to quietly become — good soil, patient, hidden, and ready to bear fruit in God’s time, not mine. 🌱
Like the widow fighting to keep her land, this Lectio is about what we ought to do when the storm has passed and the field still needs tending. Quiet endurance, stubborn hope, and the slow work of healing broken ground — that’s how hearts, farms, and even the Church bear fruit. Grace grows in hard soil when we refuse to walk away. 🌾
I’m sharing The Introverted Apostle, Episode 2, because it gently explodes the myth that the Church is powered only by the loudest voices in the room. I love how it frames how we are Church—together.
As I move through the day wearing different shades of introversion (reserved, anxious, thinking, social), this episode helped me see each not as a defect to overcome, but as a gift to be offered—in concert with the gifts of extroverts. The Body of Christ needs both the quiet heart and the bold tongue.
Give it a listen. I suspect you’ll recognize yourself somewhere in it—and find where you belong in the Body of Christ.
Here is one of those modern miracles that does not involve thunder, but does involve truth. In the latest CAPN: The WTC – The Podcast, you’ll hear the very personal story that set Karlynn Hochstein on the unlikely (and very Catholic) road to becoming our Diocese of Amarillo’s Director of Family Life. It is the sort of story that reminds us that vocations are rarely born in comfort, but almost always in conviction.
And it also explains why I’ll be at St. Mary’s Cathedral next Saturday at 10:00 a.m. for the Respect Life Mass—because when faith becomes flesh in real lives, the only reasonable response is to show up.
Give it a listen. Truth, like grace, works best when it’s personal.
Email to Bishop Zurek

Subject: A Request to Be Heard in the Spirit of Synodality During Our Centennial

Your Excellency Bishop Zurek,

I write to you with respect and with a sincere desire to remain in communion with the Church during this Centennial year of the Diocese of Amarillo.

As we approach the Centennial celebrations and the Respect Life Mass, I find myself holding an interior conflict that I cannot ignore in conscience. In prayer, particularly through Lectio Divina on the Feast of the Baptism of the Lord, I was struck by the single word spoken by Christ to John the Baptist: “Allow it.” Those words have stayed with me.

They raise a question in my heart: what does the Church allow herself to hear, and whom does she allow herself to accompany?

I desire to celebrate our Centennial and to stand in solidarity with the Church’s witness to the dignity of life. At the same time, I struggle to do so without any space for synodality regarding the Diocese of Amarillo’s Tribute to Bishop Matthiesen, especially in light of what has been acknowledged as a “serious mistake” during that period of our history. The continued silence around this tribute weighs heavily on me, not as an accusation, but as a pastoral wound.

Recently, Pope Leo reminded the Church that “abuse itself causes a deep wound, which may last a lifetime; but often the greater scandal is that the door was closed and victims were not welcomed or accompanied with the closeness of authentic pastors.” He shared the testimony of a victim who said that the most painful part was that no bishop wanted to listen. The Holy Father emphasized that listening is profoundly important and asked the Church to deepen dialogue and implement synodality.

It is in this spirit that I write. I am not asking for condemnation, nor am I asking for erasure of history. I am asking whether there can be listening—whether synodality can be allowed—so that the Centennial truly reflects the four pillars we have named: faith, hope, communion, and mission.

I want to be present at the Respect Life Mass and to celebrate our Centennial in good conscience. But I also want to know that the Church I love is willing to listen to those for whom this tribute remains a source of pain, confusion, and exclusion.

Your Excellency, I remain obedient to your pastoral authority, but I also remain compelled by conscience and prayer to ask that this conversation be allowed to take place. I believe that such listening would not diminish our celebration, but purify it.

Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. Please know of my prayers for you and for our Diocese during this significant year.

Respectfully in Christ,

Darrell

My Story
Photo used by permission of Douglas Kirkland/Corbis via Getty Images
Memorial in the Grotto of St. Mary’s Cathedral. The inscription says:
In memory of the death of innocence of the victims of clergy sexual abuse. When innocence dies…a life stops. It is essential that we never forget.
I was one of “the few” Bishop Zurek spoke of in this letter. He first posted it in August of 2019, and in response to my, “calling out all the more“, he kept reposting it atop the diocesan news page until December 11, 2019. There it remains to this day.
Fr. Ed Graff, brought here from Philadelphia by Bishop Matthiesen, was arrested in 2002 for sexually assaulting a minor and died later that year in jail. Despite the harm linked to his ministry, he was buried in an honored section of Llano Cemetery among our pioneering clergy — a decision that continues to wound survivors and raise hard questions for our diocese.
  • Bishop Matthiesen, who rode the white horse of public activism even as he brought abusive priests into our diocese such as John Salazar—wounds that still mark us today. I spoke with him often, pleading with him to reconsider his “no regrets” about bringing those priests here…
  • Bishop Yanta, who sought to enforce the Dallas Charter even when Bishop Matthiesen resisted him, and who bore the personal and pastoral cost of doing so. I met with Bishop Yanta about Bishop Matthiessen’s “no regrets” stance. He listened. He believed me. He acted where he could. And when he retired, he urged me—quietly but firmly—to keep speaking out.
  • Bishop Zurek, who told the Diocese of Amarillo he had no facts about the Philadelphia report even as Amarillo’s connection to that tragedy was headline news. When I continued to speak out, as Bishop Yanta had once urged me to do, he later wrote that I was not among the faithful and loyal disciples whom the Lord Jesus desires.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Of the Glenn Enterprises

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading