“All Dressed Up”-Saturday of the First Week of Advent LECTIO DIVINA

Advent Wreath in Front of St. Thomas’s, Amarillo

I cannot help but smile, for nothing is more astonishing than the Almighty being moved. There is something both comic and catastrophic about it.
When we are moved, we wobble; when God is moved, a whole world begins again.

A tribute built by John Salazar for Bishop Matthiesen—whom Matthiesen kept in ministry against the counsel of cardinal archbishops, giving him a “second chance.” That second chance resulted in the sexual assault of youth in our own diocese. And just before he was defrocked and sent to prison, he raised this monument in Bishop Matthiesen’s honor. Its presence remains a painful reminder of “serious mistakes” that harmed the very flock Bishop Matthiesen was meant to protect.

Nothing was said of the grotesque tribute still raised to Bishop Matthiesen by John Salazar—the convicted abuser whom Matthiesen enabled with his “no regrets.”
Nothing was said of the shepherds who turned away in the past.
Nothing was said of the sheep who still wait to be gathered.

It was a lovely show of vestments.
But a hungry sheep cannot eat brocade.

And this morning, on the First Saturday of Advent—when the Church traditionally gives Marian warmth to cold souls—there was no Mass. A handful of the faithful arrived at dawn, like beggars hoping for crumbs, only to find locked doors, and an empty sanctuary more silent than the snow.

If Advent is about learning to watch, then this Diocese is giving me a masterclass in watching—and waiting—for shepherds to remember their sheep.

“If Boston is the fault line of the child sexual-abuse scandal that has convulsed the Roman Catholic Church, then few places have felt the aftershocks more deeply than the Diocese of Amarillo.”

New York Times
August 24, 2002

Lord, if You walked through this Diocese as You walked through Galilee,
You would find us troubled and abandoned,
each in our own way limping, or blind, or bruised.

Memorial in the Grotto of St. Mary’s Cathedral. The inscription says:
In memory of the death of innocence of the victims of clergy sexual abuse. When innocence dies…a life stops. It is essential that we never forget.

Give me the charity of St. Nicholas,
that I may give without cost what I have freely received—
even the uncomfortable gifts of truth-telling and memory.

Give me, too, the humor of paradox—
that strange gift Chesterton taught me—
so I may laugh at myself
even as I weep for my Church.

And give my shepherds the courage to see:
that a Centennial wrapped in gold,
while the poor of the past remain unspoken,
is simply a pageant without a Gospel.

Here I sit, like a large and bewildered person in a snowstorm,
watching sheep bear the winter on their backs
with more dignity and honesty
than many ecclesial celebrations I have attended.

They do not pretend.
They merely carry what falls upon them.

I wonder if that is what You ask of me too:
to carry the snow of truth
until it melts into living water
for some future spring.

Today, I will practice synodal courage: I will walk with the Church as she actually is—not the festooned spectacle she wishes to appear to be.
I will speak for those whose voices froze long ago beneath the snows of silence.
And, like St. Nicholas, I will give what I can:
a plea, a truth, a witness, a small act of fidelity
that costs me nothing less than everything.

My task is small, but small things, in God’s hands, become dangerous.
Even snowflakes can start an avalanche.

Email to Bishop Zurek

Subject: A Request for Vigilance and Hope on This Last Day of the Liturgical Year

Your Excellency,

It was good to see you home at the Cathedral for Thanksgiving Mass. As we reach the end of the liturgical year and prepare for the Centennial, I write with a simple concern that continues to weigh heavily on my conscience.

In prayer, especially through the Gospel’s call to stay vigilant and strengthen what remains, I keep returning to the tribute erected by John Salazar in honor of Bishop Matthiesen. Because it was built by a priest who used his “second chance” to harm children in our diocese, its continued presence risks sending a message that wounds survivors and obscures our call to truth.

As we prepare to celebrate 100 years of the Diocese of Amarillo, I humbly ask that we consider removing this tribute as an act of healing and justice—so that our Centennial begins in truth, not silence.

Thank you for hearing my heart. Be assured of my prayers for you and for our diocese.

In Christ,
Darrell Glenn

My Story
Photo used by permission of Douglas Kirkland/Corbis via Getty Images
Memorial in the Grotto of St. Mary’s Cathedral. The inscription says:
In memory of the death of innocence of the victims of clergy sexual abuse. When innocence dies…a life stops. It is essential that we never forget.
I was one of “the few” Bishop Zurek spoke of in this letter. He first posted it in August of 2019, and in response to my, “calling out all the more“, he kept reposting it atop the diocesan news page until December 11, 2019. There it remains to this day.
Fr. Ed Graff, brought here from Philadelphia by Bishop Matthiesen, was arrested in 2002 for sexually assaulting a minor and died later that year in jail. Despite the harm linked to his ministry, he was buried in an honored section of Llano Cemetery among our pioneering clergy — a decision that continues to wound survivors and raise hard questions for our diocese.
  • Bishop Matthiesen, who rode the white horse of public activism even as he brought abusive priests into our diocese—wounds that still mark us today. I spoke with him often, pleading with him to reconsider his “no regrets” about bringing those priests here…
  • Bishop Yanta, who sought to enforce the Dallas Charter even when Bishop Matthiesen resisted him, and who bore the personal and pastoral cost of doing so. I met with Bishop Yanta about Bishop Matthiessen’s “no regrets” stance. He listened. He believed me. He acted where he could. And when he retired, he urged me—quietly but firmly—to keep speaking out.
  • Bishop Zurek, who told the Diocese of Amarillo he had no facts about the Philadelphia report even as Amarillo’s connection to that tragedy was headline news. When I continued to speak out, as Bishop Yanta had once urged me to do, he later wrote that I was not among the faithful and loyal disciples whom the Lord Jesus desires.
  • And now Bishop Strickland, whose own fall from leadership echoes the pattern — a man whose zeal burned like a torch but often without the oil of communion, misused by others, yet still a wounded shepherd who, like me, carries pawprints of injury and longing.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Of the Glenn Enterprises

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading